Jake Levy of Pier 4 on how private REITs can potentially provide tax efficiency for investors
There is an old principle in property ownership: the value of property is not defined solely by what sits on it, but by how it is held. Title, structure and stewardship determine what ultimately flows back to the owner.
That same logic increasingly applies to modern real estate investing. Exposure to residential property alone does not determine outcomes. Structure does. How income is distributed, when tax is recognized and where an investment can be held all shape what investors ultimately keep.
Jake Levy, Vice President, Finance at Pier 4, says the firm’s approach to tax efficiency is built directly into how its private REIT is structured and how investors participate. Toronto-based Pier 4 focuses on acquiring and improving Canadian multi-residential properties through a value-add strategy and active asset management, delivering access to institutional-quality residential real estate through its private REIT platform.
“Private REITs win on tax timing opposed to tax rates,” Levy says. “Historically Pier 4’s distributions have all been return of capital which has allowed investors to receive distributions without current tax. Ultimately, in investing, time is often more valuable than rate.”
Where the tax efficiency comes from
Pier 4’s REIT has historically produced tax-efficient distributions through three primary mechanisms: return of capital through its trust units, flow-through participation via limited partnership units and eligibility for registered accounts such as TFSAs and RRSPs.
Over the past five years, the REIT has delivered 100% return of capital distributions to investors. While future treatment will depend on portfolio performance and market conditions, that history reflects how the structure has functioned to date.
Return of capital does not eliminate tax, Levy stresses. It defers it. Instead of creating immediate taxable income, the distribution reduces an investor’s adjusted cost base, with tax typically recognized upon disposition.
“A common misunderstanding is that distributions are always taxable income,” he says. “Often, first-time private REIT investors assume they’re receiving dividends or capital gains. In reality, a portion or sometimes all, can be return of capital. That doesn’t mean tax disappears. It means the timing changes.”
How the structure supports that outcome
Several elements of the private REIT structure make that possible. Pier 4 uses debt to acquire and enhance properties, and interest on that debt is generally deductible at the trust level, reducing taxable income before distributions are calculated. Depreciation and other non-cash expenses tied to real estate ownership further influence how income is characterized.
The firm’s value-add strategy also plays a role.
“Reinvesting in a value-add portfolio can result in heavier expenses in the earlier stages of ownership,” Levy says. “Those heavier expenses lower taxable income before distributions and increase the likelihood of return of capital treatment.”
In addition to trust units, Pier 4 offers participation through limited partnership units, allowing certain investors to benefit from flow-through exposure tied to underlying real estate operations. Depending on the investor’s situation, that can provide another layer of tax efficiency.
Private REITs are also eligible for registered accounts such as TFSAs and RRSPs. That allows investors to hold private residential real estate exposure within tax-advantaged vehicles, something that is rarely feasible when purchasing an individual building directly.
Why structure matters alongside ownership
Direct ownership still holds a powerful allure for many investors. But replicating the same tax characteristics available through a private REIT can be difficult.
Rental income from a personally owned property is typically reported annually and taxed accordingly. Generating consistent return of capital distributions in the same structured way is not generally possible. Flow-through participation similar to a limited partnership structure is also not easily replicated.
Limited liquidity within a private REIT can also introduce discipline around tax timing. “A private REIT compared to a public REIT can force better discipline,” Levy says. “Limited liquidity removes the temptation to redeem and reduces accidental realization of gains for the investor.”
Over time, that structure allows return of capital to accumulate and tax recognition to be deferred until a planned exit.
For Levy, the takeaway is straightforward.
“In investing, time is often more valuable than rate,” he says. “Private REITs allow investors to receive distributions without current tax and then recognize that tax when they choose.”
The appeal of land has always been enduring. As Shakespeare put it, “I would give a thousand furlongs of sea for an acre of barren ground.” Investors still seek that acre. Today, how it is structured may matter just as much as owning it.